GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+8040%
2849
GeForce 210 PCI
35
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT216
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
