GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1980MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
H200 SXM 141 GB
+2248%
66910
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
132
896
Shading Units
16896
56
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
700W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GH100
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
80 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
