GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+2749%
2849
NVS 315
100
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF119
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
