GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon Pro W5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 205W)
Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1880MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon Pro W5700
+204%
8663
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3566
Radeon Pro W5700
+139%
8549
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
1607
Radeon Pro W5700
+155%
4103
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
527
Radeon Pro W5700
+82%
964
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 10
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5