GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon RX 6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2040MHz vs 1590MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon RX 6300
+9%
3133
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+134%
3566
Radeon RX 6300
1520
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+691%
1607
Radeon RX 6300
203
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 24
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7