GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (3000MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2849
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+2164%
64510
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
84
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
5376
56
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 31
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7