Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs A40 PCIe

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs A40 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1740MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
A40 PCIe +747%
37420
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
596
A40 PCIe +569%
3990

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
84
1280
Shading Units
10752
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GA102
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net