GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV380
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
