GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
FirePro S9300 X2
+80%
7987
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0