Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro V3800

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +749%
4416
FirePro V3800
520

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
400
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Redwood
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net