GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro V9800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
FirePro V9800 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+62%
4416
FirePro V9800
2720
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1600
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cypress
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0