GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+584%
4416
FirePro W4100
645
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+888%
4694
FirePro W4100
475
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
