GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+29%
5728
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Ellesmere
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7