GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 143W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1836%
4416
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
228
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
12
1280
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
143W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G80
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
