GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce G210 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+10169%
4416
GeForce G210 OEM
43
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.064GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
43.20 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G96C
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
