GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GT 140 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+2023%
4416
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
8
1280
Shading Units
64
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G94B
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
