GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GT 220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+2966%
4416
GeForce GT 220
144
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+2597%
4694
GeForce GT 220
174
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
58W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G94
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
