GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2535MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+399%
22060
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2310 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
34
1280
Shading Units
4352
80
TMUs
136
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
AD104
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
