GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 270 1024SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1725MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+133%
4416
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
