GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1343%
4416
NVS 510
306
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1760%
93
NVS 510
5
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GK107
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
