GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (1725MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+784%
4416
Radeon R7 240
499
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Oland
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
