GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 280
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1725MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+32%
4416
Radeon R9 280
3344
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+133%
4694
Radeon R9 280
2009
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1