GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 275W)
Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon R9 390
+15%
5120
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+18%
4694
Radeon R9 390
3964
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+7%
2072
Radeon R9 390
1931
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Grenada
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO
(215-0880030)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
