GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 560 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1725MHz vs 1226MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon RX 560 XT
4394
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+31%
4694
Radeon RX 560 XT
3561
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+23%
2072
Radeon RX 560 XT
1671
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1074 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Ellesmere
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
