GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (3130MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
+480%
25640
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
3130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
132
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.3 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
400.6 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
51.28 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.64 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
801.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
2x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 44
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT 8GB
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
29.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
199 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
