GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 485M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+178%
2458
GeForce GTX 485M
883
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF104
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
