GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 670M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 670M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+205%
2458
GeForce GTX 670M
804
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
7
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.372 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.49 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.7 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF114
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N13E-GS1-LP-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
