GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
M66
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
Turing
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
