Home Comparison GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M280X

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M280X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1200MHz vs 1000MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +37%
2458
Radeon R9 M280X
1792

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
112.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Saturn
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Saturn XT (216-0843024)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net