GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon RX 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)
Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1445MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2458
Radeon RX 5300M
+65%
4069
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
3150
Radeon RX 5300M
+15%
3653
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
85W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
