GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1700MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Arc Pro A40
+16%
3482
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+7%
3566
Arc Pro A40
3328
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
