GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2100MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
18560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+2638%
81720
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
153 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
