GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+9225%
2984
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV620
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1