GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 760 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1665MHz vs 1072MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+20%
2984
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2470
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1152
56
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
