GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro W8000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
FirePro W8000
+8%
3226
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
