GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+1061%
2984
GeForce GT 340 OEM
257
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT215
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
