GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1665MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
+69%
5046
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+42%
3566
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2510
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
+17%
1606
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1371
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
705 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2880
56
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK110B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-350-B1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
