GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1594MHz vs 1335MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+235%
4101
GeForce MX330
1224
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+369%
4973
GeForce MX330
1060
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1728%
2304
GeForce MX330
126
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
3
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
10W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
