GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+967%
4101
Radeon E4690 MXM
384
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1