GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M395X
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Radeon R9 M395X 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+38%
4101
Radeon R9 M395X
2961
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+97%
4973
Radeon R9 M395X
2514
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3