GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon RX 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1445MHz vs 1335MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Radeon RX 5300M
4069
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+36%
4973
Radeon RX 5300M
3653
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1408
96
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5