GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2000MHz vs 1590MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+19%
4884
Arc Pro A30M
4096
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
