GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro W5500M 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1700MHz vs 1590MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+2%
4884
Radeon Pro W5500M
4787
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1408
96
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.6 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.574 TFLOPS
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.787 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XTM
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5