GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+443%
5437
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
800
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV770
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
