GeForce GTX 260M vs Arc A370M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
Arc A370M
+930%
3174
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 200M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
