GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce2 GTS
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 32MB VRAM GeForce2 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 5.312GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2000
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
999 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
5.312GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
800.0 MPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
289W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
NV15
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GeForce2 GTS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
7.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.5
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-
