GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 6250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (19W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
+473%
596
Radeon HD 6250
104
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
289W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Cedar
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0