GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX 550X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 550X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Radeon RX 550X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
Radeon RX 550X
+103%
1211
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Lexa
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
