GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
12560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+10853%
65280
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
100
240
Shading Units
12800
80
TMUs
400
28
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
