GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 24GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
8720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
+7769%
46900
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
Blackwell PRO W
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
70
240
Shading Units
8960
80
TMUs
280
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
251.2 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
732.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.90 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.90 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GB203
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
45.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
378 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.3
CUDA
10.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
